On September 29, California Governor Gavin Newsom vetoed Senate Bill 1047, known as the Safe and Secure Innovation for Frontier Artificial Intelligence Models Act. This bill aimed to create a comprehensive regulatory framework for AI models. While the veto is a setback, it highlights important discussions surrounding AI governance and California’s potential role in shaping future regulations. 

As the birthplace of Silicon Valley, California has a history of leading technology regulation, with its policies often serving as templates for other states. The California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) has inspired similar legislation in states like Virginia and Colorado. With the rapid advancement of AI technology, California’s regulatory efforts could have a significant impact on both national and international frameworks, potentially prompting federal lawmakers to consider comprehensive AI regulations. 

Governor Newsom’s veto brings several important issues to light. The bill primarily targeted large-scale AI models, which may overlook risks associated with smaller, specialised systems. He emphasised the need for regulations based on empirical evidence of actual risks rather than just the size or cost of the models. Additionally, he cautioned that overly strict regulations could hinder innovation, advocating for a flexible approach that evolves with technology. The governor also pointed out the importance of addressing high-risk applications and sensitive data in regulatory discussions. 

Looking ahead, the veto offers California a chance to maintain its leadership in technology policy. By fostering collaboration among the legislature, industry experts, and academia, the state can work towards developing a more effective regulatory framework that balances public safety with the need for innovation.