Film composer Danny Elfman has lost a legal bid to dismiss a defamation lawsuit brought by composer Nomi Abadi. The lawsuit stems from Elfman’s public denial of Abadi’s accusations, first reported by Rolling Stone in 2023, that he exposed himself and masturbated in front of her. Elfman’s response included a statement describing the allegations as “vicious and wholly false” and accusing Abadi of attempting to “break up my marriage.”

Judge Gail Killefer ruled on December 24 that Elfman’s comments, made to Rolling Stone, were not protected under California’s litigation privilege, which shields statements made in the course of legal proceedings. The judge noted that Elfman’s statement resembled a press release aimed at shaping public opinion rather than a protected legal document.

Abadi’s lawsuit alleges that Elfman defamed her by portraying her as a “scorned woman” seeking revenge and money, causing severe damage to her reputation and career. In response, Elfman’s legal team argued that his comments were protected under California’s anti-SLAPP statute, designed to protect free speech in matters of public interest. However, Judge Killefer rejected this defence, ruling that Elfman’s statements were factual assertions that could be subject to defamation claims.

Elfman’s attorney, Camille Vasquez, stated they would appeal the decision. Abadi’s attorney has not commented. The lawsuit, which also involves claims of unpaid settlement funds from 2018, will now proceed, potentially taking years to resolve if not settled.